Litigation With the Federal Government

 

Spring 2018

 

Professor Gregory Sisk

 

 

Ground Rules

 

 

Course Goals and Coverage

 

          I welcome you to a continuing experiment in legal education that I think has been long overdue.  I have taught this course thirteen times (and the course has also been taught with my casebook at the University of Chicago, Georgetown University, George Washington University, New York University, Catholic University, the University of Alabama, the University of Pittsburgh, and of course my former institution Drake, as well as other schools).  The second edition of the casebook was published in 2008, and I also have a 2017 Update, which is available on the course web site in pdf format (with a password which I’ll send to all enrolled students by through Blackboard).

 

As everyone knows, during the last half century, the federal government has grown substantially in size and activity.  At the same time, there also has been a proliferation of statutes waiving the sovereign immunity of the United States from suit and allowing various types of claims to be filed in court against the government.

 

It is impossible to be a general litigator, especially in the federal courts, without at some point having to consider whether to pursue a claim against the federal government and thereby encountering the special issues and unique problems that we will discuss in this course.  When a lawyer makes professional judgments about such litigation, he or she should not make the mistake of assuming that the federal government is just like any other party in terms of its amenability to suit, its status in court proceedings, or its liability for alleged wrongdoing.  Mistakes flowing from such a misunderstanding may prove devastating to clients who are in litigation against the federal government.  Nor is the special status and role of the federal government of concern only to lawyers who sue the federal government.  For those who wish to serve the government in a legal position, the unique position and unusual authority of lawyers in a federal government practice, particularly at the Department of Justice, suggest moral and ethical responsibilities beyond those that apply to counsel for private individuals and entities.

 

We also learn much about a system of government by examining when and how that government responds (or does not respond) to injuries that its agents or activities have caused to its citizens.  Can the concept of sovereign immunity — that the government is immune from suit without its permission — be reconciled with democratic government?  Or is this just an archaic remnant from the era of monarchy and the autocratic view that the king can do no wrong?

 

Even if we accept sovereign immunity as a background principle, difficult questions then arise as to when the shield should be lowered and by who?  To advance justice, is it better to obtain direct judicial relief by creating a new cause of action or instead should we wait for legislative action as being more consistent with democratic governance, especially when the nature of the government’s conduct is suffused with political considerations.  In this regard, we must also consider whether the government may be warranted in taking actions that cause injury or economic loss to citizens.  Surely we all agree, to a greater or lesser extent, that the government has some legitimate authority, beyond that of a private actor, to act as a collective entity, regulating, taxing, and imposing consequences upon its own people.  Thus, are there not actions taken by the federal government which are proper, even if they would be wrongful if undertaken by private parties?  How do we account for these matters?

 

Accordingly, for these and other reasons, I am surprised that a study of the unique area of litigation with the federal government has not long since been adopted as a part of every law school curriculum.  For further insight on my goals for teaching this course, I published an article in the journal of the Association of American Law Schools.  Gregory C. Sisk, Teaching Litigation With the Federal Government, 49 J. Legal Educ. 275 (1999).  A link to this article in pdf format is available on the course web page.

 

          The general nature of this course and the purpose of our study also is set out in the preface to the casebook which you should read before the first class.   The manner in which we approach the materials and the focus of our study will vary during the course of the semester.  At most points, we will closely study individual cases as we would in other law school courses; at other points, we will discuss more generally the theories and principles underlying an area of law as illustrated by a series of cases and scholarly articles.  Repeatedly and regularly, we also will discuss the moral and policy implications raised by a topic, by certain types of government or attorney behavior, the suitability of the court system as the forum for types of grievances, etc.

 

          The casebook is designed to serve both as the source of materials for class study and as a con­tinuing resource for students interested in this area of the law.  I suggest making frequent reference to the summary of the table of contents and the table of contents both to find the material being discussed on a particular day and to see and appreciate the structured organization of the material.  Not incidentally, the summary of the table of contents may offer the beginning structure for a course outline.

 

          Like any casebook, there is much more material than we can cover in a single semester.  The breadth of the material will allow us to address certain basic matters and then to choose from a variety of other subjects for whatever time remains.  Based upon experience, I anti­cipate that we will cover about 600+ pages of material during the semester — which averages out to about 25 pages per class (some assignments will be more and some will be less).

 

The book serves both as a casebook and as a sta­tutory supplement for the course.  In addition to my desire to save students from having to purchase a separate statutory supplement, I have placed the statutory excerpts directly at the pertinent points in the book so that you hopefully develop the lawyer’s habit of looking first to the actual text of the statute before reading court decisions interpreting that language.  In addition, the casebook contains substantial note material following most of the cases that should be helpful in deciphering and analyzing the decisions, as well as provide additional information about the area of law.  Indeed, because these notes were written by the person teaching the course, they should give you a good indication of what I’ll be looking for in analysis of the cases in class and what is important to understand for later examination at the end of the semester.

 

Please refer regularly to the 2017 Update, which is keyed to the Chapter sections and pages of the casebook.  This 2017 Update includes not only additional but some substitution cases, notes, and statutes.

 

          The bulk of the course will be devoted to a study of certain basic subjects which I view as essential parts of the background currency of information for any practitioner in the area of federal government litigation.  Accordingly, I antici­pate covering the following:

 

          Chapter I (“The Federal Government as a Civil Litigator”);

 

          Chapter II (“The Doctrine of Federal Sovereign Immunity”);

         

Chapter III (Part A on the Federal Tort Claims Act);

 

Chapter IV (most (but not all) of the material in Chapter IV on the Tucker Act, the Administrative Pro­cedure Act, and the inter­relationship between the two statutes); and

 

Chapter VII (selected excerpts from this chapter on attorney’s fees, with a special focus on fee-shifting doctrine in general and against the federal govern­ment in particular).

 

          Beyond these basics, and within the limitations of time, we might look at the Suits in Admiralty Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Freedom of Information Act, or the Social Security Act.  (I’m leaning at this point toward including the Suits in Admiralty Act, as the earliest tort-like statutory waivers of sovereign immunity and a subject generally not addressed in other law school courses.)

 

          Because of the constraints of time, I expect that we are least likely to consider the material in Chapter V (“Suits Against Federal Officers”), Chapter VI (“Binding the Federal Govern­ment”); and Chapter VIII (“The United States as Plaintiff”).  These materials will be available to you as a reference source in the future should these matters arise in your practice.

 

 

Class Attendance and Participation

 

          In addition to studying the materials in the casebook, classroom discussions are a vital part of the law school learning experience, especially in a smaller class such as this.  For each class, I will prepare a lesson plan designed to fur­ther explain the subject, emphasize the important points, and supplement the reading materials with illustrations and additional comments.  The contri­butions of your fellow students in class discussions and examination of questions asked in class will also enhance your understanding of the subject, as well as contribute to your ability to interact with other (future) lawyers, analyze questions on your feet, and advocate a position before a group.  Moreover, you will be tested upon the material that is discussed in class, and material may be tested on the examination that is presented only in class.  In sum, class attendance and class participation are important.

 

          For these reasons, I hope and trust that each of you will deter­mine that attending the two class periods each week is a worthwhile use of your time.  In the end, this will be a matter of your individual responsibility. 

 

          As I have in the past for this particular course, I will end each class by designat­ing three or more people to prepare the material for the upcoming class and to lead that day’s discussion.  Thus, I will tell you ahead of time when I will call upon you to present cases or material.  During the course of the semester, every student will be assigned to lead the discussion at least a couple of times.  If you miss class or are not prepared on a day for which you are assigned to lead discussion, without good excuse, your grade will be reduced one notch.  Thus, for example, if you receive a grade of B on the final exam, but are absent or unprepared on your assignment day, your grade for the course will be a B-.

 

 


Web Site

 

          I will have set up a web page for this course (and indeed, chances are you are reading these ground rules on the web site):

 

http://courseweb.stthomas.edu/gcsisk/litfedgov.html

 

On the web page, I will post the assignment for each day, together with the students assigned for that material and with some questions (drawn largely from the note material in the casebook) to consider in reading the assigned material.  The web page will also include other information and links to other pertinent web sites.

 

 

Class Materials

 

          For this course, you will need the following:

 

        Gregory C. Sisk, Litigation With the Federal Government:  Cases and Materials (Foundation Press, 2d ed., 2008).

 

        Gregory C. Sisk, Litigation With the Federal Government:  Cases and Materials:   2017 Update and Supplement.  (This is available for free in pdf format on the web site.)

 

 

As for additional study aids, I don’t know that you need anything beyond the casebook.  If, however, you wish to pursue these topics further, I’ve also written a hornbook on the subject:  Gregory C. Sisk, Litigation with the Federal Government (West Academic Hornbook, 2016).  Because the hornbook parallels the casebook, I don’t think you need it, as the discussion in the casebook will cover what you need, but it is available as an additional resource if you wish.

 

 


 

Office Hours

 

          My office is on the fourth floor of the law school building, Room 460.  My office telephone number is 651-962-4923.  I keep no regular office hours and instead attempt to maintain an open-door policy.  (My door is usually open but sometimes may be closed to keep out noise, in which case don’t hesitate to knock, as I often will be in and available.)  However, I generally will be unable to meet with you during the two hours before each class, which means that on Monday through Wednesday, I will be preparing for and then teaching from about 9:00 to noon each day, but generally available in the afternoons and into the early evenings.  I’ll also generally set aside the time right after class is you have a question.