The Legal Environment Of Business
Dr. John Dehrer-Wendt
Uniform Commercial Code
UCC Articles 3 & 4 Outline
- If the instrument refers how the transaction arose. The instrument would be nonnegotiable if the instrument was governed or conditioned on the transaction
- If an instrument is secured by a mortgage, the instrument is still negotiable
- Since endorsements appear in the back of an instrument, endorsements cannot change the negotiability of an instrument.
- Since no one is liable on an instrument unless his/her name appears on it, endorsements are used to create liability. Hence, the transferees can demand the unqualified endorsement of their immediate transferor
- Blank Changes order paper to bearer paper
- Special Changes bearer paper to order paper
- Qualified, e.g. "Without recourse" a qualified endorsement that negate contract liability and limits certain transfer warranties to knowledge warranties
- Restrictive Does not change the negotiability
The central question of Article 3 is to determine if the holder of an instrument is a HDC. The HDC is in a stronger position and subject to fewer defenses than a mere holder. In addition, the HDC can pass their status to other transferees under the "Shelter Principle."
- OVERDUE, or
- Has been DISHONORED, or
- Any DEFENSE or CLAIM to it on the part of any person
- Infancy, Incapacity, Duress and Illegality (UCC 3-305(2)(a) and (b))
- Forgery (execution by one who is without authority to sign)
- Discharge in Bankruptcy
- Fraud in the Execution (Differs from "Fraud in the Inducement) (In Fraud in the Execution, the signer of the instrument has been deceived to believe the instrument they signed is not a negotiable instrument, e.g someone wants your autograph, but you just signed a promissory note. This is Fraud in the Execution and a HDC would lose).
- Material Alteration While a HDC is subject to the defenses of a material alteration in the cases of a raised amount, the HDC is still an HDC for the original amount of the instrument
- Breach of contract
- Non-performance of a condition precedent
- Lack of consideration
- Wrongful filling of a blank payable amount by the issuer
- Stolen instrument or other claims of ownership
- Fraud in the Inducement (e.g the Seller fraudulently induces a commercial buyer to sign a contract for aluminum siding, when infact the siding is made out of cardboard. An HDC is not subject to this type of fraud and can still demand payment. The commercial buyers recourse is to sue the salesman)
- Primary Liability a party who has primary liability is required to pay the original tenor of the instrument
- The maker of a promissory note is primarily liable
- The acceptor of a draft (when a bank certifies a check) is primarily liable. No one is primarily liable on a check at issue!
- Secondary Liability here the party is not immediately liable on the instrument
- Who is liable?
- Drawers
- Endorsers
-30-