Note: You need Adobe Acrobat reader on your computer to be able to print these articles. If your computer is not so equipped, click here to download the free version. Also note that the computers in the library and in the computer rooms already have this program loaded on the computers.  

Click here to return back to class webpage.

  I. Introduction

        1. Cooter and Ulen: Chp.2
        2. Cooter and Ulen: Chp.3
        3. Cooter and Ulen: Chp.10
        4. Epstein: ‘All Quiet on the Eastern Front’  (SKIP Section 2)
        5 .Washington Post: ‘Czech’s Downfall Shatters Hope for Economic Miracle’
        6. Flood v. Kuhn   (Questions to answer when reading the case so you know what to focus upon.)
        7. Rector v. Holy Trinity Church    (Questions to answer when reading the case so you know what to focus upon..)
 

II. Assignment of Property Rights

        1. Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & Fine   
        2. Vosburg v. Putney   
        3. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc (Goetz:  pg. 49-51) - entire case has been put  into a 2 page file   
        4. Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. (Goetz: pg. 55-58)  
        5. Sprecher v. Adamson Cos. (Goetz: pg. 69-74)  
        6. Posner’s Readings: on intellectual property      
        7. Feist v. Rural Telephone    Tuesday                         
        8. Sony  v. Universal (Betamax) (original case)  Sony v. Universal (Wikipedia)   Thursday   
                                            YOU ONLY HAVE TO READ THE WIKIPEDIA VERSION. I included the original case for your intellectual enjoyment.
                                             Don't forget the Posner reading under heading #11 below.
                    (Optional)  "Tiffany and eBay in a Fight Over Fakes"  New York Times 11/27/07
                    (Optional) “Anti-Piracy Bill Divides Studios and Tech companies” Wall Street Journal 9/27/04
                    (Optional) “Technology (A Special Report) --- TV + Web =? How the Internet is affecting what – and how – we watch” WSJ  5/12/06        
         9. (Optional) Copyright Protection on Fashion
                    "Can Fashion Be Copyrighted?”  Wall Street Journal 9/11/06   
                    “O.K., Knockoffs, This is War”  New York Times, 3/30/06      
                     “Is it OK for cheap lines to copy designer cloths?” Glamour  9/06   
        10. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Moore-Law Inc.  (Goetz: pg. 45-48)  
        11. Posner’s Readings: Eminent Domain  Thursday
                  (Optional) “Court Buttresses Eminent Domain: Local Governments Cleared To Take Private Property If Projects Promise Growth” WSJ 6/24/05 
                  (Optional) Variety of articles on Eminent Domain in the past year acroos the state
                  (Optional) Newspaper article on use of Eminent Domain in Duluth, MN Star Tribune  2/22/02
                  (Optional) Newspaper article on use of Eminent Domain in Eagan, MN  Pioneer Press 10/24/03
                  (Optional) Newspaper article on use of Eminent Domain in Chanhassen, MN Star Tribune  10/23/03
                  (Optional) Newspaper article on use of Eminent Domain in Saint Paul on West 7th Street  Star Tribune  10/23/03
        12. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council   Tuesday         
                   Visit http://www.dartmouth.edu/~wfischel/lucasupdate.html for information on the outcome of the case (optional). Copy URL into another browser.
        13. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon   Tuesday

         
II. Torts

             1. Lecture #1 

•  Historical note on forms of action   -- Scott v. Shepherd
• What is a reasonable person? (optional)--Posner pg. 183-184

            2. Lecture #2

• Elements of a tort claim/The standards of care for unintentional torts (handout to be given in class)
  
• Defenses in unintentional tort cases - contributor negligence/ assumption of risks
  • case: fireman's rule - Goetz pg. 319-326   (optional)
• Comparative negligence compromise
  • learned hand formula; for examples of how to use the Hand formula     
  • case: US v. Carroll Towing Co.   (THURSDAY)
• Taking cost minimization too seriously
  • The Case of Innocente v. Vinho: Goetz pg. 317-319  (THURSDAY)

•  Case: Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co  Tuessday (Summary given in class.)

IV. Contracts and Damages

          A. Contracts

                        1. Lecture #1 -An Introduction to Contracts and Application
                                · Contracting and efficient breach -Polinsky: 5        
                                · Elements of a contract  
                                · Bailey v. West  (Summary given in class.)
                                · Peevyhouse v. Garland         THURSDAY                             
                                   Hadley v. Baxendal  (Summary given in class.)

          B. Valuation/ Computing Damages                
                        1. Lecture #1
                                Prejudgement Interest *  (Review present value handout if necessary)
                                    · case: Buick v. Levine                                                                     
                                    · case: United Telcoms, Inc. v. American TV & Communs. Corp     
                                Evaluating Lost Future Income
                                Combine Uncertainty and Discounting